<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.labourhome.org/">
<title>Labourhome - Stories by josh fg</title>
<link>http://www.labourhome.org/</link>
<description>Back to the roots...</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Copyright 2007 - LabourHome.org</dc:rights>
<dc:date>Thu Aug  7 20:37:12 2008</dc:date>
<dc:publisher>Labourhome</dc:publisher>
<dc:creator>Labourhome</dc:creator>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labourhome.org/story/2008/5/8/9450/30704" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labourhome.org/story/2008/3/31/184634/117" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.labourhome.org/favicon.ico" />
<textinput rdf:resource="http://www.labourhome.org/search/" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.labourhome.org/favicon.ico">
<title>Labourhome</title>
<url>http://www.labourhome.org/favicon.ico</url>
<link>http://www.labourhome.org/</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.labourhome.org/story/2008/5/8/9450/30704">
<title>[Blogs] Jasper takes aim at Kate Hoey</title>
<link>http://www.labourhome.org/story/2008/5/8/9450/30704</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <div class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23482869-details/Lee+Jasper:+I'll+fight+to+gain+Kate+Hoey+seat/article.do">It appears</a> that Lee Jasper is considering a challenge to deselect Kate Hoey. Irrespective of people&rsquo;s views on Jasper I am increasingly wondering if Kate Hoey is really someone suited to being a member of the Labour party.</div> <div class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/mp.php?mpn=Kate_Hoey&amp;mpc=Vauxhall&amp;dmp=358&amp;display=motions">Having opposed the ban on fox hunting</a> called for people to vote for Ian Paisley&rsquo;s DUP, sat on the advisory group of the Tory &lsquo;I Want A Referendum&rsquo; <a href="http://www.iwantareferendum.com/whoweare.aspx">campaign aimed at unseating Labour MPs in marginal constituencies</a> and most recently given sucker to Boris Johnson's Mayoral campaign, one questions whether it is time someone challenged why exactly she is in the Labour party.<br><br>Joshua Fenton-Glynn</div> <BR><A 
href='http://messagespace.advertserve.com/advertpro/servlet/click/zone?zid=72&pid=2&lookup=true&position=1' 
target='_top'><IMG 
src='http://messagespace.advertserve.com/advertpro/servlet/view/banner/image/zone?zid=72&pid=2&position=1' 
hspace='0' vspace='0' border='0' alt='Advertise on this site with MessageSpace'></A> ]]></description>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T09:04:50-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.labourhome.org/story/2008/3/31/184634/117">
<title>[Blogs] Media: Issues and Ideology or Ken and Boris</title>
<link>http://www.labourhome.org/story/2008/3/31/184634/117</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <div>The press regularly use as an excuse for the derisory level of political coverage in this country the claim (which may often be true) that you can not get a fag paper between the main political protagonists on policy.&nbsp; However if this is the case how do they explain the coverage of the mayoral election?</div><br /> <div>The framing of the election as Ken V Boris alone shows how much we have descended to the level of Celebrity Big Brother in our news coverage when at its heart this election should be about real issues and the prize at stake is the position with the third greatest direct electoral mandate in Europe. This is a problem in the main because &lsquo;Boris&rsquo; is funny but on policy Livingstone wins hands down.</div><br /><div>On the environment, Livingstone has real policies encouraging use of public transport and dissuading people from using high polluting cars, Johnson opposes these policies while his own figures don&rsquo;t add up. </div><br /><div>On social housing something that matters to young low waged Londoners Livingstone has set the 50% target while Johnson hopes the market will sort it out.</div><br /><div>On the issue of youth crime Livingstone favours an approach of increasing opportunity and investment in places for young people to go alongside more police while Johnson as far as I can understand favours a return to racist stop and search policing of old which was so unsuccessful before (or at least that is how I read his criticism of &ldquo;politically correct policing&rdquo; in a recent campaign leaflet).</div><br /><div>&nbsp;Finally and most of all in this election we need to ask who should lead this city in a crisis. if we are to compare the Islamophobia demonstrated by Johnson in his magazine and Livingstone&rsquo;s unrivalled record on uniting all London communities and put our self in a situation in where the worst happens and we faced another terrorist attack who you would like leading this city?</div><br /><strong>Joshua Fenton-Glynn</strong> <BR><A 
href='http://messagespace.advertserve.com/advertpro/servlet/click/zone?zid=72&pid=2&lookup=true&position=2' 
target='_top'><IMG 
src='http://messagespace.advertserve.com/advertpro/servlet/view/banner/image/zone?zid=72&pid=2&position=2' 
hspace='0' vspace='0' border='0' alt='Advertise on this site with MessageSpace'></A> ]]></description>
<dc:date>2008-03-31T18:46:34-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<textinput rdf:about="http://www.labourhome.org/search/">
<title>Search Labourhome</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.labourhome.org/search/</link>
</textinput>

</rdf:RDF>